Eswatini vs Kuwait: Openness of Executive Recruitment Score

Eswatini
2
in 2018
Kuwait
2
in 2018
Eswatini rank
140th
Kuwait rank
140th

Openness of Executive Recruitment Score over time

  • Eswatini
  • Kuwait
01234196319902018

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 2 against 2 in Kuwait, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 50 shared years of data; in 1968 it was Kuwait ahead.

Eswatini ranks 140th and Kuwait ranks 140th of 166 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 1 and Kuwait in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Kuwait Difference Ahead
1960s 2 2 0
1970s 1.3 2 0.7 Kuwait
1980s 2.2 2 0.2 Eswatini
1990s 1.67 2 0.3333 Kuwait
2000s 2 2 0
2010s 2 2 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher openness of executive recruitment score, Eswatini or Kuwait?
Eswatini, at 2 against 2 in Kuwait as of 2018.
What is the difference in openness of executive recruitment score between Eswatini and Kuwait?
0, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Kuwait?
50 years are reported by both, from 1968 to 2018.
How do Eswatini and Kuwait rank globally for openness of executive recruitment score?
Eswatini ranks 140th and Kuwait ranks 140th of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Openness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Openness of Executive Recruitment Score
Source
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
167 places, 17,813 data points, 1789–2020
Last refreshed

Indicates the extent to which recruitment for the executive is open. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over hereditary succession (score of 1), dual hereditary-open arrangements with the chief minister designated (score of 2), and dual hereditary-open arrangements with the chief minister being elected (score of 3), to executive recruitment being open (score of 4).