Denmark vs Panama: Openness of Executive Recruitment Score

Denmark
4
in 2018
Panama
4
in 2018
Denmark rank
1st
Panama rank
1st

Openness of Executive Recruitment Score over time

  • Denmark
  • Panama
01234180019092018

How they compare

Denmark currently reports 4 against 4 in Panama, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 99 shared years of data; in 1915 it was Panama ahead.

Denmark ranks 1st and Panama ranks 1st of 166 countries.

Denmark has averaged higher in every one of the 11 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Denmark Panama Difference Ahead
1910s 4 4 0 β€”
1920s 4 4 0 β€”
1930s 4 4 0 β€”
1940s 4 4 0 β€”
1950s 4 4 0 β€”
1960s 4 3.2 0.8 Denmark
1970s 4 0.8 3.2 Denmark
1980s 4 4 0 β€”
1990s 4 4 0 β€”
2000s 4 4 0 β€”
2010s 4 4 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher openness of executive recruitment score, Denmark or Panama?
Denmark, at 4 against 4 in Panama as of 2018.
What is the difference in openness of executive recruitment score between Denmark and Panama?
0, with Denmark ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Panama?
99 years are reported by both, from 1915 to 2018.
How do Denmark and Panama rank globally for openness of executive recruitment score?
Denmark ranks 1st and Panama ranks 1st of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Openness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Openness of Executive Recruitment Score
Source
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
167 places, 17,813 data points, 1789–2020
Last refreshed

Indicates the extent to which recruitment for the executive is open. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over hereditary succession (score of 1), dual hereditary-open arrangements with the chief minister designated (score of 2), and dual hereditary-open arrangements with the chief minister being elected (score of 3), to executive recruitment being open (score of 4).