Chile vs Mauritius: Openness of Executive Recruitment Score
Chile
4
in 2018
Mauritius
4
in 2018
Chile rank
1st
Mauritius rank
1st
Openness of Executive Recruitment Score over time
- Chile
- Mauritius
How they compare
Chile currently reports 4 against 4 in Mauritius, a difference of 0.
Across all 51 years both countries report, Mauritius has been ahead every year.
Chile ranks 1st and Mauritius ranks 1st of 166 countries.
Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 1.2 | 4 | 2.8 | Mauritius |
| 1980s | 0.4 | 4 | 3.6 | Mauritius |
| 1990s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher openness of executive recruitment score, Chile or Mauritius?
- Chile, at 4 against 4 in Mauritius as of 2018.
- What is the difference in openness of executive recruitment score between Chile and Mauritius?
- 0, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Mauritius?
- 51 years are reported by both, from 1968 to 2018.
- How do Chile and Mauritius rank globally for openness of executive recruitment score?
- Chile ranks 1st and Mauritius ranks 1st of 166 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Openness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which recruitment for the executive is open. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over hereditary succession (score of 1), dual hereditary-open arrangements with the chief minister designated (score of 2), and dual hereditary-open arrangements with the chief minister being elected (score of 3), to executive recruitment being open (score of 4).