Azerbaijan vs China: Openness of Executive Recruitment Score

Azerbaijan
4
in 2018
China
4
in 2018
Azerbaijan rank
1st
China rank
1st

Openness of Executive Recruitment Score over time

  • Azerbaijan
  • China
01234180019092018

How they compare

Azerbaijan currently reports 4 against 4 in China, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 192 shared years of data; in 1813 it was China ahead.

Azerbaijan ranks 1st and China ranks 1st of 167 countries.

Across the 21 decades both report, Azerbaijan averaged higher in 1 and China in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Azerbaijan China Difference Ahead
1810s 1 1 0 —
1820s 1 1 0 —
1830s 1 1 0 —
1840s 1 1 0 —
1850s 1 1 0 —
1860s 1 1 0 —
1870s 1 1 0 —
1880s 1 1 0 —
1890s 1 1 0 —
1900s 1.44 1 0.4444 Azerbaijan
1910s 1.25 3.12 1.88 China
1920s 3.2 4 0.8 China
1930s 4 4 0 —
1940s 4 4 0 —
1950s 4 4 0 —
1960s 4 4 0 —
1970s 4 4 0 —
1980s 4 4 0 —
1990s 4 4 0 —
2000s 4 4 0 —
2010s 4 4 0 —

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher openness of executive recruitment score, Azerbaijan or China?
Azerbaijan, at 4 against 4 in China as of 2018.
What is the difference in openness of executive recruitment score between Azerbaijan and China?
0, with Azerbaijan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and China?
192 years are reported by both, from 1813 to 2018.
How do Azerbaijan and China rank globally for openness of executive recruitment score?
Azerbaijan ranks 1st and China ranks 1st of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Openness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Azerbaijan vs China: Openness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid, drawing on Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/openness-of-executive-recruitment-score/azerbaijan/china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/openness-of-executive-recruitment-score/azerbaijan/china/">Azerbaijan vs China: Openness of Executive Recruitment Score</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Openness of Executive Recruitment Score
Source
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
167 places, 17,813 data points, 1789–2020
Last refreshed

Indicates the extent to which recruitment for the executive is open. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over hereditary succession (score of 1), dual hereditary-open arrangements with the chief minister designated (score of 2), and dual hereditary-open arrangements with the chief minister being elected (score of 3), to executive recruitment being open (score of 4).