Austria vs Cuba: Openness of Executive Recruitment Score
Austria
4
in 2018
Cuba
4
in 2018
Austria rank
1st
Cuba rank
1st
Openness of Executive Recruitment Score over time
- Austria
- Cuba
How they compare
Austria currently reports 4 against 4 in Cuba, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 101 shared years of data; in 1902 it was Cuba ahead.
Austria ranks 1st and Cuba ranks 1st of 166 countries.
Across the 12 decades both report, Austria averaged higher in 5 and Cuba in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Austria | Cuba | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 2 | 4 | 2 | Cuba |
| 1910s | 2 | 4 | 2 | Cuba |
| 1920s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1930s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1940s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1950s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1960s | 4 | 0 | 4 | Austria |
| 1970s | 4 | 0 | 4 | Austria |
| 1980s | 4 | 0 | 4 | Austria |
| 1990s | 4 | 0 | 4 | Austria |
| 2000s | 4 | 1.6 | 2.4 | Austria |
| 2010s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher openness of executive recruitment score, Austria or Cuba?
- Austria, at 4 against 4 in Cuba as of 2018.
- What is the difference in openness of executive recruitment score between Austria and Cuba?
- 0, with Austria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Cuba?
- 101 years are reported by both, from 1902 to 2018.
- How do Austria and Cuba rank globally for openness of executive recruitment score?
- Austria ranks 1st and Cuba ranks 1st of 166 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Openness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which recruitment for the executive is open. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over hereditary succession (score of 1), dual hereditary-open arrangements with the chief minister designated (score of 2), and dual hereditary-open arrangements with the chief minister being elected (score of 3), to executive recruitment being open (score of 4).