Austria vs Congo, Dem. Rep.: Openness of Executive Recruitment Score

Austria
4
in 2018
Congo, Dem. Rep.
4
in 2018
Austria rank
1st
Congo, Dem. Rep. rank
1st

Openness of Executive Recruitment Score over time

  • Austria
  • Congo, Dem. Rep.
1234180019092018

How they compare

Austria currently reports 4 against 4 in Congo, Dem. Rep., a difference of 0.

Across all 40 years both countries report, Congo, Dem. Rep. has been ahead every year.

Austria ranks 1st and Congo, Dem. Rep. ranks 1st of 166 countries.

Head to head by decade

Decade Austria Congo, Dem. Rep. Difference Ahead
1960s 4 4 0 β€”
1970s 4 4 0 β€”
1980s 4 4 0 β€”
1990s 4 4 0 β€”
2000s 4 4 0 β€”
2010s 4 4 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher openness of executive recruitment score, Austria or Congo, Dem. Rep.?
Austria, at 4 against 4 in Congo, Dem. Rep. as of 2018.
What is the difference in openness of executive recruitment score between Austria and Congo, Dem. Rep.?
0, with Austria ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Congo, Dem. Rep.?
40 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2018.
How do Austria and Congo, Dem. Rep. rank globally for openness of executive recruitment score?
Austria ranks 1st and Congo, Dem. Rep. ranks 1st of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Openness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Openness of Executive Recruitment Score
Source
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
167 places, 17,813 data points, 1789–2020
Last refreshed

Indicates the extent to which recruitment for the executive is open. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over hereditary succession (score of 1), dual hereditary-open arrangements with the chief minister designated (score of 2), and dual hereditary-open arrangements with the chief minister being elected (score of 3), to executive recruitment being open (score of 4).