Austria vs Chile: Openness of Executive Recruitment Score

Austria
4
in 2018
Chile
4
in 2018
Austria rank
1st
Chile rank
1st

Openness of Executive Recruitment Score over time

  • Austria
  • Chile
01234180019092018

How they compare

Austria currently reports 4 against 4 in Chile, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 189 shared years of data; in 1818 it was Chile ahead.

Austria ranks 1st and Chile ranks 1st of 166 countries.

Across the 21 decades both report, Austria averaged higher in 2 and Chile in 11.

Head to head by decade

Decade Austria Chile Difference Ahead
1810s 1 4 3 Chile
1820s 1 4 3 Chile
1830s 1 4 3 Chile
1840s 1 4 3 Chile
1850s 1 4 3 Chile
1860s 1.3 4 2.7 Chile
1870s 2 4 2 Chile
1880s 2 4 2 Chile
1890s 2 4 2 Chile
1900s 2 4 2 Chile
1910s 2 4 2 Chile
1920s 4 4 0 β€”
1930s 4 4 0 β€”
1940s 4 4 0 β€”
1950s 4 4 0 β€”
1960s 4 4 0 β€”
1970s 4 1.2 2.8 Austria
1980s 4 0.4 3.6 Austria
1990s 4 4 0 β€”
2000s 4 4 0 β€”
2010s 4 4 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher openness of executive recruitment score, Austria or Chile?
Austria, at 4 against 4 in Chile as of 2018.
What is the difference in openness of executive recruitment score between Austria and Chile?
0, with Austria ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Chile?
189 years are reported by both, from 1818 to 2018.
How do Austria and Chile rank globally for openness of executive recruitment score?
Austria ranks 1st and Chile ranks 1st of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Openness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Openness of Executive Recruitment Score
Source
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
167 places, 17,813 data points, 1789–2020
Last refreshed

Indicates the extent to which recruitment for the executive is open. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over hereditary succession (score of 1), dual hereditary-open arrangements with the chief minister designated (score of 2), and dual hereditary-open arrangements with the chief minister being elected (score of 3), to executive recruitment being open (score of 4).