Austria vs Botswana: Openness of Executive Recruitment Score
Austria
4
in 2018
Botswana
4
in 2018
Austria rank
1st
Botswana rank
1st
Openness of Executive Recruitment Score over time
- Austria
- Botswana
How they compare
Austria currently reports 4 against 4 in Botswana, a difference of 0.
Across all 53 years both countries report, Botswana has been ahead every year.
Austria ranks 1st and Botswana ranks 1st of 166 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Austria | Botswana | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher openness of executive recruitment score, Austria or Botswana?
- Austria, at 4 against 4 in Botswana as of 2018.
- What is the difference in openness of executive recruitment score between Austria and Botswana?
- 0, with Austria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Botswana?
- 53 years are reported by both, from 1966 to 2018.
- How do Austria and Botswana rank globally for openness of executive recruitment score?
- Austria ranks 1st and Botswana ranks 1st of 166 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Openness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which recruitment for the executive is open. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over hereditary succession (score of 1), dual hereditary-open arrangements with the chief minister designated (score of 2), and dual hereditary-open arrangements with the chief minister being elected (score of 3), to executive recruitment being open (score of 4).