Australia vs Laos: Openness of Executive Recruitment Score

Australia
4
in 2018
Laos
4
in 2018
Australia rank
1st
Laos rank
1st

Openness of Executive Recruitment Score over time

  • Australia
  • Laos
01234190119592018

How they compare

Australia currently reports 4 against 4 in Laos, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 52 shared years of data; in 1953 it was Australia ahead.

Australia ranks 1st and Laos ranks 1st of 167 countries.

Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Laos Difference Ahead
1950s 4 2.86 1.14 Australia
1960s 4 2 2 Australia
1970s 4 4 0 —
1980s 4 4 0 —
1990s 4 4 0 —
2000s 4 4 0 —
2010s 4 4 0 —

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher openness of executive recruitment score, Australia or Laos?
Australia, at 4 against 4 in Laos as of 2018.
What is the difference in openness of executive recruitment score between Australia and Laos?
0, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Laos?
52 years are reported by both, from 1953 to 2018.
How do Australia and Laos rank globally for openness of executive recruitment score?
Australia ranks 1st and Laos ranks 1st of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Openness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Laos: Openness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid, drawing on Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/openness-of-executive-recruitment-score/australia/lao-pdr/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/openness-of-executive-recruitment-score/australia/lao-pdr/">Australia vs Laos: Openness of Executive Recruitment Score</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Openness of Executive Recruitment Score
Source
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
167 places, 17,813 data points, 1789–2020
Last refreshed

Indicates the extent to which recruitment for the executive is open. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over hereditary succession (score of 1), dual hereditary-open arrangements with the chief minister designated (score of 2), and dual hereditary-open arrangements with the chief minister being elected (score of 3), to executive recruitment being open (score of 4).