El Salvador vs Tajikistan: People not using improved sanitation facilities
El Salvador
75,817 people
in 2024
Tajikistan
72,720 people
in 2023
El Salvador rank
103rd
Tajikistan rank
105th
People not using improved sanitation facilities over time
- El Salvador
- Tajikistan
How they compare
El Salvador currently reports 75,817 people against 72,720 people in Tajikistan, a difference of 3,097 people.
Across all 24 years both countries report, El Salvador has been ahead every year.
El Salvador ranks 103rd and Tajikistan ranks 105th of 232 countries.
El Salvador has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Tajikistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 511,267 people | 351,862 people | 159,405 people | El Salvador |
| 2010s | 257,573 people | 172,281 people | 85,292 people | El Salvador |
| 2020s | 114,730 people | 71,500 people | 43,231 people | El Salvador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher people not using improved sanitation facilities, El Salvador or Tajikistan?
- El Salvador, at 75,817 people against 72,720 people in Tajikistan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in people not using improved sanitation facilities between El Salvador and Tajikistan?
- 3,097 people, with El Salvador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Tajikistan?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do El Salvador and Tajikistan rank globally for people not using improved sanitation facilities?
- El Salvador ranks 103rd and Tajikistan ranks 105th of 232 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) β processed by Our World in Data, published as People not using improved sanitation facilities. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
If no improved sanitation facility is available, people might practice open defecation or use unimproved sanitation facilities.