Guinea vs Iceland: Non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure

Guinea
20.1%
in 2019
Iceland
16.5%
in 2017
Guinea rank
12th
Iceland rank
14th

Non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure over time

  • Guinea
  • Iceland
0102030200920142019

How they compare

Guinea currently reports 20.1% against 16.5% in Iceland, a difference of 3.6%.

That makes Guinea's figure about 1.2 times Iceland's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Iceland ahead.

Guinea ranks 12th and Iceland ranks 14th of 56 countries.

Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure, Guinea or Iceland?
Guinea, at 20.1% against 16.5% in Iceland as of 2019.
What is the difference in non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure between Guinea and Iceland?
3.6%, with Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea and Iceland?
6 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2017.
How do Guinea and Iceland rank globally for non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure?
Guinea ranks 12th and Iceland ranks 14th of 56 countries.
Where does this data come from?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in upper secondary public institutions (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guinea vs Iceland: Non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure. Statizoid, drawing on UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/non-teaching-staff-compensation-as-a-percentage-of-total-expenditure-in-upper-secondary/guinea/iceland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/non-teaching-staff-compensation-as-a-percentage-of-total-expenditure-in-upper-secondary/guinea/iceland/">Guinea vs Iceland: Non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in upper secondary public institutions (%)
Unit
%
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
56 places, 613 data points, 1995–2019
Last refreshed

Non-teacher (e.g. school directors, support staff, administrative staff in local or central Ministries) compensation expressed as a percentage of direct expenditure in public educational institutions (instructional and non-instructional) of the specified level of education. Financial aid to students and other transfers are excluded from direct expenditure. Staff compensation includes salaries, contributions by employers for staff retirement programmes, and other allowances and benefits. To calculate the indicator, divide non-teacher compensation in public institutions of a given level of education (ex. primary, secondary, or all levels combined) by total expenditure (current and capital) in public institutions of the same level of education, and multiply by 100. Limitations: Although countries responding to the UIS questionnaire on educational expenditure are required to follow common definitions for staff compensation, in some cases government budget classifications may differ. It is also often difficult to separate staff compensation between teachers and non-teachers, as these are usually grouped together in country's accounting systems. In general, respondent countries must use estimation methods to separate teacher and non-teacher staff compensation. For more information, consult the UNESCO Institute of Statistics website: http://www.uis.unesco.org/Education/