Czechia vs Moldova: Non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure
Non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure over time
- Czechia
- Moldova
How they compare
Moldova currently reports 22.4% against 18.6% in Czechia, a difference of 3.8%.
That makes Moldova's figure about 1.2 times Czechia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Moldova ahead.
Czechia ranks 8th and Moldova ranks 7th of 28 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Czechia averaged higher in 1 and Moldova in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Moldova | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 13.6% | 17.1% | 3.4% | Moldova |
| 2010s | 23.6% | 19.3% | 4.3% | Czechia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure, Czechia or Moldova?
- Moldova, at 22.4% against 18.6% in Czechia as of 2015.
- What is the difference in non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure between Czechia and Moldova?
- 3.8%, with Moldova ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Moldova?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2015.
- How do Czechia and Moldova rank globally for non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure?
- Czechia ranks 8th and Moldova ranks 7th of 28 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in post-secondary non-tertiary public institutions (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Non-teacher (e.g. school directors, support staff, administrative staff in local or central Ministries) compensation expressed as a percentage of direct expenditure in public educational institutions (instructional and non-instructional) of the specified level of education. Financial aid to students and other transfers are excluded from direct expenditure. Staff compensation includes salaries, contributions by employers for staff retirement programmes, and other allowances and benefits. To calculate the indicator, divide non-teacher compensation in public institutions of a given level of education (ex. primary, secondary, or all levels combined) by total expenditure (current and capital) in public institutions of the same level of education, and multiply by 100. Limitations: Although countries responding to the UIS questionnaire on educational expenditure are required to follow common definitions for staff compensation, in some cases government budget classifications may differ. It is also often difficult to separate staff compensation between teachers and non-teachers, as these are usually grouped together in country's accounting systems. In general, respondent countries must use estimation methods to separate teacher and non-teacher staff compensation. For more information, consult the UNESCO Institute of Statistics website: http://www.uis.unesco.org/Education/