South Africa vs Suriname: Minimum requirement calories
South Africa
1,849
in 2024
Suriname
1,848
in 2024
South Africa rank
96th
Suriname rank
97th
Minimum requirement calories over time
- South Africa
- Suriname
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 1,849 against 1,848 in Suriname, a difference of 1.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was South Africa ahead.
South Africa ranks 96th and Suriname ranks 97th of 195 countries.
South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Africa | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,844 | 1,813 | 31.4 | South Africa |
| 2010s | 1,849 | 1,832 | 17.2 | South Africa |
| 2020s | 1,847 | 1,846 | 1 | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher minimum requirement calories, South Africa or Suriname?
- South Africa, at 1,849 against 1,848 in Suriname as of 2024.
- What is the difference in minimum requirement calories between South Africa and Suriname?
- 1, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Africa and Suriname?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do South Africa and Suriname rank globally for minimum requirement calories?
- South Africa ranks 96th and Suriname ranks 97th of 195 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Minimum requirement calories. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.