South Sudan vs Togo: Legislative Checks on Government Index
South Sudan
0.236
in 2025
Togo
0.193
in 2025
South Sudan rank
137th
Togo rank
138th
Legislative Checks on Government Index over time
- South Sudan
- Togo
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 0.236 against 0.193 in Togo, a difference of 0.043.
That makes South Sudan's figure about 1.2 times Togo's.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 68 shared years of data; in 1946 it was South Sudan ahead.
South Sudan ranks 137th and Togo ranks 138th of 174 countries.
Across the 8 decades both report, South Sudan averaged higher in 3 and Togo in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Sudan | Togo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1940s | 0.482 | 0.2408 | 0.2412 | South Sudan |
| 1950s | 0.1761 | 0.2456 | 0.0695 | Togo |
| 1960s | 0.5669 | 0.2089 | 0.358 | South Sudan |
| 1980s | 0.223 | 0.065 | 0.158 | South Sudan |
| 1990s | 0.1356 | 0.3854 | 0.2498 | Togo |
| 2000s | 0.1873 | 0.4363 | 0.249 | Togo |
| 2010s | 0.2961 | 0.4672 | 0.1711 | Togo |
| 2020s | 0.2318 | 0.3342 | 0.1023 | Togo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher legislative checks on government index, South Sudan or Togo?
- South Sudan, at 0.236 against 0.193 in Togo as of 2025.
- What is the difference in legislative checks on government index between South Sudan and Togo?
- 0.043, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Sudan and Togo?
- 68 years are reported by both, from 1946 to 2025.
- How do South Sudan and Togo rank globally for legislative checks on government index?
- South Sudan ranks 137th and Togo ranks 138th of 174 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Legislative Checks on Government Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which the legislature, including opposition parties, questions executive officials and oversees and investigates the executive.