Iceland vs Nepal: Legislative Checks on Government Index

Iceland
0.792
in 2025
Nepal
0.789
in 2025
Iceland rank
53rd
Nepal rank
56th

Legislative Checks on Government Index over time

  • Iceland
  • Nepal
0.20.40.60.81190019622025

How they compare

Iceland currently reports 0.792 against 0.789 in Nepal, a difference of 0.003.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 67 shared years of data; in 1959 it was Iceland ahead.

Iceland ranks 53rd and Nepal ranks 56th of 174 countries.

Across the 8 decades both report, Iceland averaged higher in 6 and Nepal in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iceland Nepal Difference Ahead
1950s 0.749 0.522 0.227 Iceland
1960s 0.749 0.3494 0.3996 Iceland
1970s 0.749 0.2652 0.4838 Iceland
1980s 0.7681 0.485 0.2831 Iceland
1990s 0.804 0.7378 0.0662 Iceland
2000s 0.8037 0.7849 0.0188 Iceland
2010s 0.8217 0.8995 0.0778 Nepal
2020s 0.8033 0.8232 0.0198 Nepal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher legislative checks on government index, Iceland or Nepal?
Iceland, at 0.792 against 0.789 in Nepal as of 2025.
What is the difference in legislative checks on government index between Iceland and Nepal?
0.003, with Iceland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Nepal?
67 years are reported by both, from 1959 to 2025.
How do Iceland and Nepal rank globally for legislative checks on government index?
Iceland ranks 53rd and Nepal ranks 56th of 174 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Legislative Checks on Government Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Legislative Checks on Government Index
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
174 places, 23,601 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the extent to which the legislature, including opposition parties, questions executive officials and oversees and investigates the executive.