Croatia vs Ghana: Legislative Checks on Government Index

Croatia
0.871
in 2025
Ghana
0.878
in 2025
Croatia rank
36th
Ghana rank
34th

Legislative Checks on Government Index over time

  • Croatia
  • Ghana
00.20.40.60.8190219632025

How they compare

Ghana currently reports 0.878 against 0.871 in Croatia, a difference of 0.007.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 82 shared years of data; in 1942 it was Ghana ahead.

Croatia ranks 36th and Ghana ranks 34th of 174 countries.

Ghana has averaged higher in every one of the 9 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Croatia Ghana Difference Ahead
1940s 0.2148 0.302 0.0872 Ghana
1950s 0.218 0.4088 0.1908 Ghana
1960s 0.218 0.3734 0.1554 Ghana
1970s 0.2336 0.4607 0.2271 Ghana
1980s 0.2408 0.4215 0.1807 Ghana
1990s 0.3451 0.6579 0.3128 Ghana
2000s 0.7446 0.897 0.1524 Ghana
2010s 0.8404 0.8609 0.0205 Ghana
2020s 0.8618 0.8733 0.0115 Ghana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher legislative checks on government index, Croatia or Ghana?
Ghana, at 0.878 against 0.871 in Croatia as of 2025.
What is the difference in legislative checks on government index between Croatia and Ghana?
0.007, with Ghana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Ghana?
82 years are reported by both, from 1942 to 2025.
How do Croatia and Ghana rank globally for legislative checks on government index?
Croatia ranks 36th and Ghana ranks 34th of 174 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Legislative Checks on Government Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Legislative Checks on Government Index
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
174 places, 23,601 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the extent to which the legislature, including opposition parties, questions executive officials and oversees and investigates the executive.