Bhutan vs Latvia: Legislative Checks on Government Index

Bhutan
0.833
in 2025
Latvia
0.822
in 2025
Bhutan rank
45th
Latvia rank
47th

Legislative Checks on Government Index over time

  • Bhutan
  • Latvia
00.20.40.60.8190619652025

How they compare

Bhutan currently reports 0.833 against 0.822 in Latvia, a difference of 0.011.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 73 shared years of data; in 1953 it was Bhutan ahead.

Bhutan ranks 45th and Latvia ranks 47th of 174 countries.

Across the 8 decades both report, Bhutan averaged higher in 5 and Latvia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bhutan Latvia Difference Ahead
1950s 0.124 0.051 0.073 Bhutan
1960s 0.124 0.051 0.073 Bhutan
1970s 0.124 0.051 0.073 Bhutan
1980s 0.124 0.1058 0.0182 Bhutan
1990s 0.1502 0.7516 0.6014 Latvia
2000s 0.375 0.7741 0.3991 Latvia
2010s 0.8128 0.8122 0.0006 Bhutan
2020s 0.8183 0.8218 0.0035 Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher legislative checks on government index, Bhutan or Latvia?
Bhutan, at 0.833 against 0.822 in Latvia as of 2025.
What is the difference in legislative checks on government index between Bhutan and Latvia?
0.011, with Bhutan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Latvia?
73 years are reported by both, from 1953 to 2025.
How do Bhutan and Latvia rank globally for legislative checks on government index?
Bhutan ranks 45th and Latvia ranks 47th of 174 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Legislative Checks on Government Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Legislative Checks on Government Index
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
174 places, 23,601 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the extent to which the legislature, including opposition parties, questions executive officials and oversees and investigates the executive.