Guinea-Bissau vs Sierra Leone: Institutionalized autocracy
Institutionalized autocracy over time
- Guinea-Bissau
- Sierra Leone
How they compare
Guinea-Bissau currently reports 1 against 1 in Sierra Leone, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 38 shared years of data; in 1974 it was Guinea-Bissau ahead.
Guinea-Bissau ranks 21st and Sierra Leone ranks 21st of 51 countries.
Guinea-Bissau has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guinea-Bissau | Sierra Leone | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 7 | 6.33 | 0.6667 | Guinea-Bissau |
| 1980s | 7.6 | 7 | 0.6 | Guinea-Bissau |
| 1990s | -13.9 | -18.9 | 5 | Guinea-Bissau |
| 2000s | 0.5 | -16.2 | 16.7 | Guinea-Bissau |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher institutionalized autocracy, Guinea-Bissau or Sierra Leone?
- Guinea-Bissau, at 1 against 1 in Sierra Leone as of 2011.
- What is the difference in institutionalized autocracy between Guinea-Bissau and Sierra Leone?
- 0, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Sierra Leone?
- 38 years are reported by both, from 1974 to 2011.
- How do Guinea-Bissau and Sierra Leone rank globally for institutionalized autocracy?
- Guinea-Bissau ranks 21st and Sierra Leone ranks 21st of 51 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Center for Systemic Peace, www.systemicpeace.org/polity/polity4.htm, published as Institutionalized autocracy. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Democracy is conceived as three essential, interdependent elements. One is the presence of institutions and procedures through which citizens can express effective preferences about alternative policies and leaders. Second is the existence of institutionalized constraints on the exercise of power by the executive. Third is the guarantee of civil liberties to all citizens in their daily lives and in acts of political participation. Other aspects of plural democracy, such as the rule of law, systems of checks and balances, freedom of the press, and so on are means to, or specific manifestations of, these general principles. We do not include coded data on civil liberties.