Cape Verde vs Lesotho: Institutionalized autocracy
Institutionalized autocracy over time
- Cape Verde
- Lesotho
How they compare
Cape Verde currently reports 0 against 0 in Lesotho, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 37 shared years of data; in 1975 it was Lesotho ahead.
Cape Verde ranks 32nd and Lesotho ranks 32nd of 51 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Cape Verde averaged higher in 2 and Lesotho in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cape Verde | Lesotho | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 6 | 7 | 1 | Lesotho |
| 1980s | 5.5 | 7 | 1.5 | Lesotho |
| 1990s | 0.4 | -14.4 | 14.8 | Cape Verde |
| 2000s | 0 | -17.6 | 17.6 | Cape Verde |
| 2010s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher institutionalized autocracy, Cape Verde or Lesotho?
- Cape Verde, at 0 against 0 in Lesotho as of 2011.
- What is the difference in institutionalized autocracy between Cape Verde and Lesotho?
- 0, with Cape Verde ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Lesotho?
- 37 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2011.
- How do Cape Verde and Lesotho rank globally for institutionalized autocracy?
- Cape Verde ranks 32nd and Lesotho ranks 32nd of 51 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Center for Systemic Peace, www.systemicpeace.org/polity/polity4.htm, published as Institutionalized autocracy. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Democracy is conceived as three essential, interdependent elements. One is the presence of institutions and procedures through which citizens can express effective preferences about alternative policies and leaders. Second is the existence of institutionalized constraints on the exercise of power by the executive. Third is the guarantee of civil liberties to all citizens in their daily lives and in acts of political participation. Other aspects of plural democracy, such as the rule of law, systems of checks and balances, freedom of the press, and so on are means to, or specific manifestations of, these general principles. We do not include coded data on civil liberties.