Burundi vs Cote d'Ivoire: Institutionalized autocracy
Institutionalized autocracy over time
- Burundi
- Cote d'Ivoire
How they compare
Burundi currently reports 1 against 1 in Cote d'Ivoire, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 50 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Cote d'Ivoire ahead.
Burundi ranks 21st and Cote d'Ivoire ranks 21st of 51 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Burundi averaged higher in 2 and Cote d'Ivoire in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burundi | Cote d'Ivoire | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | -6.12 | 9 | 15.12 | Cote d'Ivoire |
| 1970s | 7 | 9 | 2 | Cote d'Ivoire |
| 1980s | 7 | 9 | 2 | Cote d'Ivoire |
| 1990s | -29.1 | -3 | 26.1 | Cote d'Ivoire |
| 2000s | -34.5 | -64.7 | 30.2 | Burundi |
| 2010s | 1 | -38 | 39 | Burundi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher institutionalized autocracy, Burundi or Cote d'Ivoire?
- Burundi, at 1 against 1 in Cote d'Ivoire as of 2011.
- What is the difference in institutionalized autocracy between Burundi and Cote d'Ivoire?
- 0, with Burundi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Cote d'Ivoire?
- 50 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2011.
- How do Burundi and Cote d'Ivoire rank globally for institutionalized autocracy?
- Burundi ranks 21st and Cote d'Ivoire ranks 21st of 51 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Center for Systemic Peace, www.systemicpeace.org/polity/polity4.htm, published as Institutionalized autocracy. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Democracy is conceived as three essential, interdependent elements. One is the presence of institutions and procedures through which citizens can express effective preferences about alternative policies and leaders. Second is the existence of institutionalized constraints on the exercise of power by the executive. Third is the guarantee of civil liberties to all citizens in their daily lives and in acts of political participation. Other aspects of plural democracy, such as the rule of law, systems of checks and balances, freedom of the press, and so on are means to, or specific manifestations of, these general principles. We do not include coded data on civil liberties.