Burkina Faso vs Egypt: Institutionalized autocracy

Burkina Faso
2
in 2011
Egypt
2
in 2011
Burkina Faso rank
14th
Egypt rank
14th

Institutionalized autocracy over time

  • Burkina Faso
  • Egypt
-80-60-40-200196019852011

How they compare

Burkina Faso currently reports 2 against 2 in Egypt, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Egypt ahead.

Burkina Faso ranks 14th and Egypt ranks 14th of 51 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Burkina Faso averaged higher in 1 and Egypt in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burkina Faso Egypt Difference Ahead
1960s 6.9 7 0.1 Egypt
1970s -5.8 6.6 12.4 Egypt
1980s 7 6 1 Burkina Faso
1990s 4.9 6 1.1 Egypt
2000s 2.1 5 2.9 Egypt
2010s 2 3 1 Egypt

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher institutionalized autocracy, Burkina Faso or Egypt?
Burkina Faso, at 2 against 2 in Egypt as of 2011.
What is the difference in institutionalized autocracy between Burkina Faso and Egypt?
0, with Burkina Faso ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Egypt?
52 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2011.
How do Burkina Faso and Egypt rank globally for institutionalized autocracy?
Burkina Faso ranks 14th and Egypt ranks 14th of 51 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Center for Systemic Peace, www.systemicpeace.org/polity/polity4.htm, published as Institutionalized autocracy. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Institutionalized autocracy
Source
Center for Systemic Peace, www.systemicpeace.org/polity/polity4.htm
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
51 places, 2,427 data points, 1960–2011
Last refreshed

Democracy is conceived as three essential, interdependent elements. One is the presence of institutions and procedures through which citizens can express effective preferences about alternative policies and leaders. Second is the existence of institutionalized constraints on the exercise of power by the executive. Third is the guarantee of civil liberties to all citizens in their daily lives and in acts of political participation. Other aspects of plural democracy, such as the rule of law, systems of checks and balances, freedom of the press, and so on are means to, or specific manifestations of, these general principles. We do not include coded data on civil liberties.