Japan vs Macao: Initial household funding per tertiary student, constant PPP$
Initial household funding per tertiary student, constant PPP$ over time
- Japan
- Macao
How they compare
Macao currently reports 7,776 against 7,252 in Japan, a difference of 524.
That makes Macao's figure about 1.1 times Japan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Macao ahead.
Japan ranks 2nd and Macao ranks 1st of 53 countries.
Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher initial household funding per tertiary student, constant ppp$, Japan or Macao?
- Macao, at 7,776 against 7,252 in Japan as of 2018.
- What is the difference in initial household funding per tertiary student, constant ppp$ between Japan and Macao?
- 524, with Macao ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Macao?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2016.
- How do Japan and Macao rank globally for initial household funding per tertiary student, constant ppp$?
- Japan ranks 2nd and Macao ranks 1st of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Initial household funding per tertiary student, constant PPP$. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total payments of households (pupils, students and their families) for educational institutions (such as for tuition fees, exam and registration fees, contribution to Parent-Teacher associations or other school funds, and fees for canteen, boarding and transport) and purchases outside of educational institutions (such as for uniforms, textbooks, teaching materials, or private classes). 'Initial funding' means that government transfers to households, such as scholarships and other financial aid for education, are subtracted from what is spent by households. Note that in some countries for some education levels, the value of this indicator may be 0, since on average households may be receiving as much, or more, in financial aid from the government than what they are spending on education. Calculation: Total payments of households (pupils, students and their families) for educational institutions (such as for tuition fees, exam and registration fees, contribution to Parent-Teacher associations or other school funds, and fees for canteen, boarding and transport), plus purchases outside of educational institutions (such as for uniforms, textbooks, teaching materials, or private classes), minus government education transfers to households (such as scholarships or other education-specific financial aid). Limitations: Indicators for household expenditure on education should be interpreted with caution since data comes from household surveys which may not all follow the same definitions and concepts. These types of surveys are also not carried out in all countries with regularity, and for some categories (such as pupils in pre-primary education), the sample sizes may be low. In some cases where data on government transfers to households (scholarships and other financial aid) was not available, they could not be subtracted from amounts paid by households. For more information, consult the UNESCO Institute of Statistics website: http://www.uis.unesco.org/Education/