Cameroon vs Lithuania: Initial household funding per tertiary student, constant PPP$

Cameroon
994.76
in 2012
Lithuania
991.5
in 2017
Cameroon rank
36th
Lithuania rank
37th

Initial household funding per tertiary student, constant PPP$ over time

  • Cameroon
  • Lithuania
02505007501.0k1.2k200320102017

How they compare

Cameroon currently reports 994.76 against 991.5 in Lithuania, a difference of 3.26.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Cameroon ahead.

Cameroon ranks 36th and Lithuania ranks 37th of 53 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Cameroon averaged higher in 1 and Lithuania in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cameroon Lithuania Difference Ahead
2000s 1,026 876.68 149.33 Cameroon
2010s 995.92 1,006 10.24 Lithuania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher initial household funding per tertiary student, constant ppp$, Cameroon or Lithuania?
Cameroon, at 994.76 against 991.5 in Lithuania as of 2012.
What is the difference in initial household funding per tertiary student, constant ppp$ between Cameroon and Lithuania?
3.26, with Cameroon ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cameroon and Lithuania?
9 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2012.
How do Cameroon and Lithuania rank globally for initial household funding per tertiary student, constant ppp$?
Cameroon ranks 36th and Lithuania ranks 37th of 53 countries.
Where does this data come from?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Initial household funding per tertiary student, constant PPP$. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cameroon vs Lithuania: Initial household funding per tertiary student, constant PPP$. Statizoid, drawing on UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/initial-household-funding-per-tertiary-student-constant-ppp/cameroon/lithuania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/initial-household-funding-per-tertiary-student-constant-ppp/cameroon/lithuania/">Cameroon vs Lithuania: Initial household funding per tertiary student, constant PPP$</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Initial household funding per tertiary student, constant PPP$
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
53 places, 496 data points, 1995–2019
Last refreshed

Total payments of households (pupils, students and their families) for educational institutions (such as for tuition fees, exam and registration fees, contribution to Parent-Teacher associations or other school funds, and fees for canteen, boarding and transport) and purchases outside of educational institutions (such as for uniforms, textbooks, teaching materials, or private classes). 'Initial funding' means that government transfers to households, such as scholarships and other financial aid for education, are subtracted from what is spent by households. Note that in some countries for some education levels, the value of this indicator may be 0, since on average households may be receiving as much, or more, in financial aid from the government than what they are spending on education. Calculation: Total payments of households (pupils, students and their families) for educational institutions (such as for tuition fees, exam and registration fees, contribution to Parent-Teacher associations or other school funds, and fees for canteen, boarding and transport), plus purchases outside of educational institutions (such as for uniforms, textbooks, teaching materials, or private classes), minus government education transfers to households (such as scholarships or other education-specific financial aid). Limitations: Indicators for household expenditure on education should be interpreted with caution since data comes from household surveys which may not all follow the same definitions and concepts. These types of surveys are also not carried out in all countries with regularity, and for some categories (such as pupils in pre-primary education), the sample sizes may be low. In some cases where data on government transfers to households (scholarships and other financial aid) was not available, they could not be subtracted from amounts paid by households. For more information, consult the UNESCO Institute of Statistics website: http://www.uis.unesco.org/Education/