Cameroon vs Madagascar: Individual Liberties and Equality before the Law Index
Cameroon
0.489
in 2025
Madagascar
0.482
in 2025
Cameroon rank
120th
Madagascar rank
122nd
Individual Liberties and Equality before the Law Index over time
- Cameroon
- Madagascar
How they compare
Cameroon currently reports 0.489 against 0.482 in Madagascar, a difference of 0.007.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 65 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Madagascar ahead.
Cameroon ranks 120th and Madagascar ranks 122nd of 176 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Cameroon averaged higher in 4 and Madagascar in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cameroon | Madagascar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.258 | 0.425 | 0.167 | Madagascar |
| 1970s | 0.263 | 0.412 | 0.149 | Madagascar |
| 1980s | 0.4712 | 0.408 | 0.0632 | Cameroon |
| 1990s | 0.6225 | 0.559 | 0.0635 | Cameroon |
| 2000s | 0.6464 | 0.5907 | 0.0557 | Cameroon |
| 2010s | 0.5667 | 0.5212 | 0.0455 | Cameroon |
| 2020s | 0.5007 | 0.561 | 0.0603 | Madagascar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher individual liberties and equality before the law index, Cameroon or Madagascar?
- Cameroon, at 0.489 against 0.482 in Madagascar as of 2025.
- What is the difference in individual liberties and equality before the law index between Cameroon and Madagascar?
- 0.007, with Cameroon ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cameroon and Madagascar?
- 65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2025.
- How do Cameroon and Madagascar rank globally for individual liberties and equality before the law index?
- Cameroon ranks 120th and Madagascar ranks 122nd of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Individual Liberties and Equality before the Law Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which extent to which citizens enjoy physical integrity rights, freedoms of religion, of movement, and from forced labor, as well as access to justice, laws are transparent, and public administration is impartial.