East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Nicaragua: Gross intake ratio to the last grade of primary education, adjusted

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
1 GPIA
in 2019
Nicaragua
1.09 GPIA
in 2010
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) rank
19th
Nicaragua rank
17th

Gross intake ratio to the last grade of primary education, adjusted over time

  • East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
  • Nicaragua
00.511.5197019942019

How they compare

Nicaragua currently reports 1.09 GPIA against 1 GPIA in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income), a difference of 0.09 GPIA.

That makes Nicaragua's figure about 1.1 times East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)'s.

Across all 12 years both countries report, Nicaragua has been ahead every year.

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 19th and Nicaragua ranks 17th of 42 groups.

Nicaragua has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) Nicaragua Difference Ahead
1990s 0.9632 GPIA 1.13 GPIA 0.1669 GPIA Nicaragua
2000s 0.9918 GPIA 1.11 GPIA 0.1192 GPIA Nicaragua
2010s 0.9973 GPIA 1.09 GPIA 0.0887 GPIA Nicaragua

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross intake ratio to the last grade of primary education, adjusted, East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) or Nicaragua?
Nicaragua, at 1.09 GPIA against 1 GPIA in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) as of 2010.
What is the difference in gross intake ratio to the last grade of primary education, adjusted between East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Nicaragua?
0.09 GPIA, with Nicaragua ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Nicaragua?
12 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2010.
How do East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Nicaragua rank globally for gross intake ratio to the last grade of primary education, adjusted?
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 19th and Nicaragua ranks 17th of 42 groups.
Where does this data come from?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross intake ratio to the last grade of primary education, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Nicaragua: Gross intake ratio to the last grade of primary education, adjusted. Statizoid, drawing on UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/gross-intake-ratio-to-the-last-grade-of-primary-education-adjusted-gender-parity-index/east-asia-and-pacific-excluding-high-income/nicaragua/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/gross-intake-ratio-to-the-last-grade-of-primary-education-adjusted-gender-parity-index/east-asia-and-pacific-excluding-high-income/nicaragua/">East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Nicaragua: Gross intake ratio to the last grade of primary education, adjusted</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross intake ratio to the last grade of primary education, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)
Unit
GPIA
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
224 places, 6,064 data points, 1970–2020
Last refreshed

The Adjusted Gender Parity Index (GPIA) is calculated by dividing the female value for the indicator by the male value for the indicator. If the resulting value exceeds 1, the ratio is inverted and subtracted from 2. The adjusted gender parity index is symmetrical around 1 and lies in the range 0-2. An adjusted GPI equal to 1 indicates parity between females and males. In general, a value less than 1 indicates disparity in favor of males and a value greater than 1 indicates disparity in favor of females. For more information, consult the UNESCO Institute for Statistics: http://uis.unesco.org/