Iceland vs Serbia: Gross fixed capital formation by main asset type - annual data
Iceland
154.58
in 2025
Serbia
140.83
in 2025
Iceland rank
3rd
Serbia rank
6th
Gross fixed capital formation by main asset type - annual data over time
- Iceland
- Serbia
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 154.58 against 140.83 in Serbia, a difference of 13.75.
That makes Iceland's figure about 1.1 times Serbia's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Iceland ahead.
Iceland ranks 3rd and Serbia ranks 6th of 51 countries.
Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 55.91 | 25.27 | 30.64 | Iceland |
| 2000s | 91.26 | 52.42 | 38.84 | Iceland |
| 2010s | 80.21 | 72.19 | 8.03 | Iceland |
| 2020s | 130.95 | 123.28 | 7.68 | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross fixed capital formation by main asset type - annual data, Iceland or Serbia?
- Iceland, at 154.58 against 140.83 in Serbia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation by main asset type - annual data between Iceland and Serbia?
- 13.75, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Serbia?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2025.
- How do Iceland and Serbia rank globally for gross fixed capital formation by main asset type - annual data?
- Iceland ranks 3rd and Serbia ranks 6th of 51 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Eurostat, published as Gross fixed capital formation by main asset type - annual data. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.