Sub-Saharan Africa vs Viet Nam: Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, male
Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, male over time
- Sub-Saharan Africa
- Viet Nam
How they compare
Viet Nam currently reports 108.0% against 86.4% in Sub-Saharan Africa, a difference of 21.6%.
That makes Viet Nam's figure about 1.2 times Sub-Saharan Africa's.
Across all 20 years both countries report, Viet Nam has been ahead every year.
Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 42nd and Viet Nam ranks 39th of 45 groups.
Viet Nam has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sub-Saharan Africa | Viet Nam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 69.6% | 101.0% | 31.4% | Viet Nam |
| 2000s | 79.5% | 97.0% | 17.5% | Viet Nam |
| 2010s | 86.8% | 102.3% | 15.5% | Viet Nam |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, male, Sub-Saharan Africa or Viet Nam?
- Viet Nam, at 108.0% against 86.4% in Sub-Saharan Africa as of 2019.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, male between Sub-Saharan Africa and Viet Nam?
- 21.6%, with Viet Nam ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sub-Saharan Africa and Viet Nam?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2018.
- How do Sub-Saharan Africa and Viet Nam rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, male?
- Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 42nd and Viet Nam ranks 39th of 45 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, male (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total male enrollment in primary and lower secondary education, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the male population of official primary and lower secondary education age. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.