Lower middle income vs Luxembourg: Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, male
Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, male over time
- Lower middle income
- Luxembourg
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports 109.6% against 92.4% in Lower middle income, a difference of 17.2%.
That makes Luxembourg's figure about 1.2 times Lower middle income's.
Across all 19 years both countries report, Luxembourg has been ahead every year.
Lower middle income ranks 31st and Luxembourg ranks 32nd of 43 groups.
Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lower middle income | Luxembourg | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 85.4% | 101.9% | 16.5% | Luxembourg |
| 2000s | 90.1% | 102.1% | 12.0% | Luxembourg |
| 2010s | 94.1% | 104.4% | 10.2% | Luxembourg |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, male, Lower middle income or Luxembourg?
- Luxembourg, at 109.6% against 92.4% in Lower middle income as of 2018.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, male between Lower middle income and Luxembourg?
- 17.2%, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lower middle income and Luxembourg?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2018.
- How do Lower middle income and Luxembourg rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, male?
- Lower middle income ranks 31st and Luxembourg ranks 32nd of 43 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, male (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total male enrollment in primary and lower secondary education, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the male population of official primary and lower secondary education age. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.