Low income vs Nicaragua: Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, male
Low income
88.6%
in 2018
Nicaragua
108.0%
in 2010
Low income rank
40th
Nicaragua rank
38th
Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, male over time
- Low income
- Nicaragua
How they compare
Nicaragua currently reports 108.0% against 88.6% in Low income, a difference of 19.4%.
That makes Nicaragua's figure about 1.2 times Low income's.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Nicaragua has been ahead every year.
Low income ranks 40th and Nicaragua ranks 38th of 45 groups.
Nicaragua has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Low income | Nicaragua | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 65.1% | 86.5% | 21.4% | Nicaragua |
| 2000s | 77.8% | 101.4% | 23.6% | Nicaragua |
| 2010s | 87.4% | 108.0% | 20.6% | Nicaragua |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, male, Low income or Nicaragua?
- Nicaragua, at 108.0% against 88.6% in Low income as of 2010.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, male between Low income and Nicaragua?
- 19.4%, with Nicaragua ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Low income and Nicaragua?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2010.
- How do Low income and Nicaragua rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, male?
- Low income ranks 40th and Nicaragua ranks 38th of 45 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, male (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total male enrollment in primary and lower secondary education, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the male population of official primary and lower secondary education age. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.