Low & middle income vs Naoero: Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, male
Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, male over time
- Low & middle income
- Naoero
How they compare
Naoero currently reports 109.9% against 95.5% in Low & middle income, a difference of 14.4%.
That makes Naoero's figure about 1.2 times Low & middle income's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 1998 it was Naoero ahead.
Low & middle income ranks 31st and Naoero ranks 30th of 45 groups.
Across the 3 decades both report, Low & middle income averaged higher in 1 and Naoero in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Low & middle income | Naoero | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 91.2% | 97.1% | 6.0% | Naoero |
| 2000s | 93.4% | 91.5% | 1.9% | Low & middle income |
| 2010s | 95.9% | 105.2% | 9.2% | Naoero |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, male, Low & middle income or Naoero?
- Naoero, at 109.9% against 95.5% in Low & middle income as of 2019.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, male between Low & middle income and Naoero?
- 14.4%, with Naoero ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Low & middle income and Naoero?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2019.
- How do Low & middle income and Naoero rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, male?
- Low & middle income ranks 31st and Naoero ranks 30th of 45 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, male (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total male enrollment in primary and lower secondary education, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the male population of official primary and lower secondary education age. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.