Lithuania vs Sao Tome and Principe: Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, male
Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, male over time
- Lithuania
- Sao Tome and Principe
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 106.3% against 105.9% in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 0.4%.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
Lithuania ranks 51st and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 54th of 188 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Lithuania averaged higher in 1 and Sao Tome and Principe in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Sao Tome and Principe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 105.2% | 106.3% | 1.0% | Sao Tome and Principe |
| 2010s | 104.7% | 104.3% | 0.5% | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, male, Lithuania or Sao Tome and Principe?
- Lithuania, at 106.3% against 105.9% in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2018.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, male between Lithuania and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 0.4%, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2017.
- How do Lithuania and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, male?
- Lithuania ranks 51st and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 54th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, male (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total male enrollment in primary and lower secondary education, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the male population of official primary and lower secondary education age. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.