Least developed countries vs Malawi: Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, male
Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, male over time
- Least developed countries
- Malawi
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 108.4% against 91.0% in Least developed countries, a difference of 17.4%.
That makes Malawi's figure about 1.2 times Least developed countries's.
Across all 20 years both countries report, Malawi has been ahead every year.
Least developed countries ranks 34th and Malawi ranks 35th of 43 groups.
Malawi has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Least developed countries | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 67.8% | 109.5% | 41.7% | Malawi |
| 2000s | 79.9% | 101.2% | 21.3% | Malawi |
| 2010s | 89.8% | 108.2% | 18.4% | Malawi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, male, Least developed countries or Malawi?
- Malawi, at 108.4% against 91.0% in Least developed countries as of 2019.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, male between Least developed countries and Malawi?
- 17.4%, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Least developed countries and Malawi?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2019.
- How do Least developed countries and Malawi rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, male?
- Least developed countries ranks 34th and Malawi ranks 35th of 43 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, male (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total male enrollment in primary and lower secondary education, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the male population of official primary and lower secondary education age. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.