Least developed countries vs Libya: Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, male
Least developed countries
91.0%
in 2019
Libya
108.7%
in 2006
Least developed countries rank
34th
Libya rank
34th
Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, male over time
- Least developed countries
- Libya
How they compare
Libya currently reports 108.7% against 91.0% in Least developed countries, a difference of 17.7%.
That makes Libya's figure about 1.2 times Least developed countries's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Libya has been ahead every year.
Least developed countries ranks 34th and Libya ranks 34th of 43 groups.
Libya has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, male, Least developed countries or Libya?
- Libya, at 108.7% against 91.0% in Least developed countries as of 2006.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, male between Least developed countries and Libya?
- 17.7%, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Least developed countries and Libya?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2006.
- How do Least developed countries and Libya rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, male?
- Least developed countries ranks 34th and Libya ranks 34th of 43 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, male (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total male enrollment in primary and lower secondary education, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the male population of official primary and lower secondary education age. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.