Israel vs Trinidad and Tobago: Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, male
Israel
104.8%
in 2018
Trinidad and Tobago
105.2%
in 2009
Israel rank
64th
Trinidad and Tobago rank
62nd
Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, male over time
- Israel
- Trinidad and Tobago
How they compare
Trinidad and Tobago currently reports 105.2% against 104.8% in Israel, a difference of 0.4%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 1999 it was Israel ahead.
Israel ranks 64th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 62nd of 188 countries.
Israel has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Israel | Trinidad and Tobago | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 103.1% | 94.8% | 8.3% | Israel |
| 2000s | 103.2% | 97.9% | 5.3% | Israel |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, male, Israel or Trinidad and Tobago?
- Trinidad and Tobago, at 105.2% against 104.8% in Israel as of 2009.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, male between Israel and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 0.4%, with Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2009.
- How do Israel and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, male?
- Israel ranks 64th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 62nd of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, male (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total male enrollment in primary and lower secondary education, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the male population of official primary and lower secondary education age. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.