IDA total vs Nicaragua: Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, male
IDA total
88.9%
in 2019
Nicaragua
108.0%
in 2010
IDA total rank
38th
Nicaragua rank
38th
Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, male over time
- IDA total
- Nicaragua
How they compare
Nicaragua currently reports 108.0% against 88.9% in IDA total, a difference of 19.1%.
That makes Nicaragua's figure about 1.2 times IDA total's.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Nicaragua has been ahead every year.
IDA total ranks 38th and Nicaragua ranks 38th of 45 groups.
Nicaragua has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | IDA total | Nicaragua | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 72.0% | 86.5% | 14.5% | Nicaragua |
| 2000s | 80.6% | 101.4% | 20.7% | Nicaragua |
| 2010s | 85.9% | 108.0% | 22.1% | Nicaragua |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, male, IDA total or Nicaragua?
- Nicaragua, at 108.0% against 88.9% in IDA total as of 2010.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, male between IDA total and Nicaragua?
- 19.1%, with Nicaragua ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for IDA total and Nicaragua?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2010.
- How do IDA total and Nicaragua rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, male?
- IDA total ranks 38th and Nicaragua ranks 38th of 45 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, male (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total male enrollment in primary and lower secondary education, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the male population of official primary and lower secondary education age. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.