Hong Kong, China vs Low income: Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, male
Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, male over time
- Hong Kong, China
- Low income
How they compare
Hong Kong, China currently reports 107.8% against 88.6% in Low income, a difference of 19.2%.
That makes Hong Kong, China's figure about 1.2 times Low income's.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Hong Kong, China has been ahead every year.
Hong Kong, China ranks 40th and Low income ranks 40th of 188 countries.
Hong Kong, China has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong, China | Low income | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 97.1% | 66.3% | 30.8% | Hong Kong, China |
| 2010s | 106.7% | 88.2% | 18.5% | Hong Kong, China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, male, Hong Kong, China or Low income?
- Hong Kong, China, at 107.8% against 88.6% in Low income as of 2019.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, male between Hong Kong, China and Low income?
- 19.2%, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Low income?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2018.
- How do Hong Kong, China and Low income rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, male?
- Hong Kong, China ranks 40th and Low income ranks 40th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, male (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total male enrollment in primary and lower secondary education, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the male population of official primary and lower secondary education age. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.