East Asia & Pacific vs Uruguay: Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, male
Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, male over time
- East Asia & Pacific
- Uruguay
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 112.8% against 100.4% in East Asia & Pacific, a difference of 12.4%.
That makes Uruguay's figure about 1.1 times East Asia & Pacific's.
Across all 16 years both countries report, Uruguay has been ahead every year.
East Asia & Pacific ranks 18th and Uruguay ranks 20th of 45 groups.
Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | East Asia & Pacific | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 98.4% | 105.9% | 7.5% | Uruguay |
| 2000s | 98.8% | 111.3% | 12.5% | Uruguay |
| 2010s | 98.8% | 113.2% | 14.4% | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, male, East Asia & Pacific or Uruguay?
- Uruguay, at 112.8% against 100.4% in East Asia & Pacific as of 2018.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, male between East Asia & Pacific and Uruguay?
- 12.4%, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific and Uruguay?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2018.
- How do East Asia & Pacific and Uruguay rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, male?
- East Asia & Pacific ranks 18th and Uruguay ranks 20th of 45 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, male (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total male enrollment in primary and lower secondary education, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the male population of official primary and lower secondary education age. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.