Cayman Islands vs Congo: Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, male
Cayman Islands
86.2%
in 2018
Congo
88.4%
in 2012
Cayman Islands rank
162nd
Congo rank
159th
Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, male over time
- Cayman Islands
- Congo
How they compare
Congo currently reports 88.4% against 86.2% in Cayman Islands, a difference of 2.2%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 1999 it was Cayman Islands ahead.
Cayman Islands ranks 162nd and Congo ranks 159th of 188 countries.
Cayman Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cayman Islands | Congo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 106.5% | 53.4% | 53.1% | Cayman Islands |
| 2000s | 93.9% | 88.8% | 5.0% | Cayman Islands |
| 2010s | 90.7% | 88.4% | 2.3% | Cayman Islands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, male, Cayman Islands or Congo?
- Congo, at 88.4% against 86.2% in Cayman Islands as of 2012.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, male between Cayman Islands and Congo?
- 2.2%, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cayman Islands and Congo?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2012.
- How do Cayman Islands and Congo rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, male?
- Cayman Islands ranks 162nd and Congo ranks 159th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, male (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total male enrollment in primary and lower secondary education, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the male population of official primary and lower secondary education age. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.