Rwanda vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female
Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female over time
- Rwanda
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
How they compare
Saint Kitts and Nevis currently reports 108.8% against 108.3% in Rwanda, a difference of 0.5%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
Rwanda ranks 31st and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 29th of 188 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Rwanda averaged higher in 1 and Saint Kitts and Nevis in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Rwanda | Saint Kitts and Nevis | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 94.8% | 111.9% | 17.1% | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
| 2010s | 115.7% | 108.8% | 6.9% | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female, Rwanda or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- Saint Kitts and Nevis, at 108.8% against 108.3% in Rwanda as of 2016.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female between Rwanda and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 0.5%, with Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2016.
- How do Rwanda and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female?
- Rwanda ranks 31st and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 29th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total female enrollment in primary and lower secondary education, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the female population of official primary and lower secondary education age. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.