Post-demographic dividend vs Tonga: Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female
Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female over time
- Post-demographic dividend
- Tonga
How they compare
Tonga currently reports 114.0% against 101.8% in Post-demographic dividend, a difference of 12.2%.
That makes Tonga's figure about 1.1 times Post-demographic dividend's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Tonga has been ahead every year.
Post-demographic dividend ranks 10th and Tonga ranks 11th of 43 groups.
Tonga has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Post-demographic dividend | Tonga | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 102.6% | 110.6% | 8.0% | Tonga |
| 2000s | 102.4% | 108.5% | 6.1% | Tonga |
| 2010s | 101.6% | 114.0% | 12.4% | Tonga |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female, Post-demographic dividend or Tonga?
- Tonga, at 114.0% against 101.8% in Post-demographic dividend as of 2015.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female between Post-demographic dividend and Tonga?
- 12.2%, with Tonga ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Post-demographic dividend and Tonga?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2015.
- How do Post-demographic dividend and Tonga rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female?
- Post-demographic dividend ranks 10th and Tonga ranks 11th of 43 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total female enrollment in primary and lower secondary education, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the female population of official primary and lower secondary education age. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.