Low & middle income vs Rwanda: Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female
Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female over time
- Low & middle income
- Rwanda
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 108.3% against 93.9% in Low & middle income, a difference of 14.4%.
That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.2 times Low & middle income's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 21 shared years of data; in 1999 it was Low & middle income ahead.
Low & middle income ranks 29th and Rwanda ranks 31st of 43 groups.
Across the 3 decades both report, Low & middle income averaged higher in 1 and Rwanda in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Low & middle income | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 82.4% | 75.5% | 6.9% | Low & middle income |
| 2000s | 88.6% | 95.9% | 7.3% | Rwanda |
| 2010s | 94.9% | 113.7% | 18.8% | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female, Low & middle income or Rwanda?
- Rwanda, at 108.3% against 93.9% in Low & middle income as of 2019.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female between Low & middle income and Rwanda?
- 14.4%, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Low & middle income and Rwanda?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2019.
- How do Low & middle income and Rwanda rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female?
- Low & middle income ranks 29th and Rwanda ranks 31st of 43 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total female enrollment in primary and lower secondary education, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the female population of official primary and lower secondary education age. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.