Least developed countries vs Timor-Leste: Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female

Least developed countries
86.3%
in 2019
Timor-Leste
107.3%
in 2019
Least developed countries rank
35th
Timor-Leste rank
37th

Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female over time

  • Least developed countries
  • Timor-Leste
0255075100125199720082019

How they compare

Timor-Leste currently reports 107.3% against 86.3% in Least developed countries, a difference of 21.0%.

That makes Timor-Leste's figure about 1.2 times Least developed countries's.

Across all 12 years both countries report, Timor-Leste has been ahead every year.

Least developed countries ranks 35th and Timor-Leste ranks 37th of 43 groups.

Timor-Leste has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Least developed countries Timor-Leste Difference Ahead
2000s 78.8% 101.0% 22.2% Timor-Leste
2010s 84.4% 109.2% 24.8% Timor-Leste

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female, Least developed countries or Timor-Leste?
Timor-Leste, at 107.3% against 86.3% in Least developed countries as of 2019.
What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female between Least developed countries and Timor-Leste?
21.0%, with Timor-Leste ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Least developed countries and Timor-Leste?
12 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2019.
How do Least developed countries and Timor-Leste rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female?
Least developed countries ranks 35th and Timor-Leste ranks 37th of 43 groups.
Where does this data come from?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Least developed countries vs Timor-Leste: Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female. Statizoid, drawing on UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/gross-enrolment-ratio-primary-and-lower-secondary-female-percent/least-developed-countries-un-classification/timor-leste/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/gross-enrolment-ratio-primary-and-lower-secondary-female-percent/least-developed-countries-un-classification/timor-leste/">Least developed countries vs Timor-Leste: Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female (%)
Unit
%
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
233 places, 4,500 data points, 1981–2020
Last refreshed

Total female enrollment in primary and lower secondary education, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the female population of official primary and lower secondary education age. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.