Kazakhstan vs Nicaragua: Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female
Kazakhstan
108.8%
in 2019
Nicaragua
109.2%
in 2010
Kazakhstan rank
28th
Nicaragua rank
25th
Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female over time
- Kazakhstan
- Nicaragua
How they compare
Nicaragua currently reports 109.2% against 108.8% in Kazakhstan, a difference of 0.4%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 1999 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 28th and Nicaragua ranks 25th of 188 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 1 and Nicaragua in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Nicaragua | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 95.0% | 90.5% | 4.5% | Kazakhstan |
| 2000s | 99.3% | 103.6% | 4.3% | Nicaragua |
| 2010s | 104.0% | 109.2% | 5.1% | Nicaragua |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female, Kazakhstan or Nicaragua?
- Nicaragua, at 109.2% against 108.8% in Kazakhstan as of 2010.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female between Kazakhstan and Nicaragua?
- 0.4%, with Nicaragua ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Nicaragua?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2010.
- How do Kazakhstan and Nicaragua rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female?
- Kazakhstan ranks 28th and Nicaragua ranks 25th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total female enrollment in primary and lower secondary education, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the female population of official primary and lower secondary education age. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.