IDA & IBRD total vs Rwanda: Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female
Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female over time
- IDA & IBRD total
- Rwanda
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 108.3% against 94.0% in IDA & IBRD total, a difference of 14.3%.
That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.2 times IDA & IBRD total's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 21 shared years of data; in 1999 it was IDA & IBRD total ahead.
IDA & IBRD total ranks 28th and Rwanda ranks 31st of 43 groups.
Across the 3 decades both report, IDA & IBRD total averaged higher in 1 and Rwanda in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | IDA & IBRD total | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 82.5% | 75.5% | 7.0% | IDA & IBRD total |
| 2000s | 88.7% | 95.9% | 7.3% | Rwanda |
| 2010s | 94.9% | 113.7% | 18.8% | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female, IDA & IBRD total or Rwanda?
- Rwanda, at 108.3% against 94.0% in IDA & IBRD total as of 2019.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female between IDA & IBRD total and Rwanda?
- 14.3%, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for IDA & IBRD total and Rwanda?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2019.
- How do IDA & IBRD total and Rwanda rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female?
- IDA & IBRD total ranks 28th and Rwanda ranks 31st of 43 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total female enrollment in primary and lower secondary education, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the female population of official primary and lower secondary education age. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.