IDA & IBRD total vs Nicaragua: Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female
Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female over time
- IDA & IBRD total
- Nicaragua
How they compare
Nicaragua currently reports 109.2% against 94.0% in IDA & IBRD total, a difference of 15.2%.
That makes Nicaragua's figure about 1.2 times IDA & IBRD total's.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Nicaragua has been ahead every year.
IDA & IBRD total ranks 30th and Nicaragua ranks 25th of 45 groups.
Nicaragua has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | IDA & IBRD total | Nicaragua | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 82.5% | 90.5% | 8.0% | Nicaragua |
| 2000s | 88.3% | 103.6% | 15.3% | Nicaragua |
| 2010s | 93.4% | 109.2% | 15.7% | Nicaragua |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female, IDA & IBRD total or Nicaragua?
- Nicaragua, at 109.2% against 94.0% in IDA & IBRD total as of 2010.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female between IDA & IBRD total and Nicaragua?
- 15.2%, with Nicaragua ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for IDA & IBRD total and Nicaragua?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2010.
- How do IDA & IBRD total and Nicaragua rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female?
- IDA & IBRD total ranks 30th and Nicaragua ranks 25th of 45 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total female enrollment in primary and lower secondary education, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the female population of official primary and lower secondary education age. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.