High income vs Namibia: Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female
High income
102.3%
in 2019
Namibia
118.5%
in 2017
High income rank
9th
Namibia rank
7th
Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female over time
- High income
- Namibia
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 118.5% against 102.3% in High income, a difference of 16.2%.
That makes Namibia's figure about 1.2 times High income's.
Across all 19 years both countries report, Namibia has been ahead every year.
High income ranks 9th and Namibia ranks 7th of 43 groups.
Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | High income | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 100.8% | 105.9% | 5.1% | Namibia |
| 2000s | 101.5% | 106.1% | 4.6% | Namibia |
| 2010s | 102.0% | 112.4% | 10.4% | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female, High income or Namibia?
- Namibia, at 118.5% against 102.3% in High income as of 2017.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female between High income and Namibia?
- 16.2%, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for High income and Namibia?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2017.
- How do High income and Namibia rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female?
- High income ranks 9th and Namibia ranks 7th of 43 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total female enrollment in primary and lower secondary education, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the female population of official primary and lower secondary education age. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.