East Asia & Pacific vs Tunisia: Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female
Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female over time
- East Asia & Pacific
- Tunisia
How they compare
Tunisia currently reports 113.3% against 100.6% in East Asia & Pacific, a difference of 12.7%.
That makes Tunisia's figure about 1.1 times East Asia & Pacific's.
Across all 22 years both countries report, Tunisia has been ahead every year.
East Asia & Pacific ranks 15th and Tunisia ranks 14th of 45 groups.
Tunisia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | East Asia & Pacific | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 94.1% | 99.1% | 5.0% | Tunisia |
| 2000s | 97.2% | 109.0% | 11.8% | Tunisia |
| 2010s | 98.2% | 111.0% | 12.8% | Tunisia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female, East Asia & Pacific or Tunisia?
- Tunisia, at 113.3% against 100.6% in East Asia & Pacific as of 2018.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female between East Asia & Pacific and Tunisia?
- 12.7%, with Tunisia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific and Tunisia?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2018.
- How do East Asia & Pacific and Tunisia rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female?
- East Asia & Pacific ranks 15th and Tunisia ranks 14th of 45 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total female enrollment in primary and lower secondary education, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the female population of official primary and lower secondary education age. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.