Denmark vs Low income: Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female
Denmark
106.2%
in 2018
Low income
80.2%
in 2018
Denmark rank
43rd
Low income rank
42nd
Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female over time
- Denmark
- Low income
How they compare
Denmark currently reports 106.2% against 80.2% in Low income, a difference of 26.0%.
That makes Denmark's figure about 1.3 times Low income's.
Across all 20 years both countries report, Denmark has been ahead every year.
Denmark ranks 43rd and Low income ranks 42nd of 188 countries.
Denmark has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Denmark | Low income | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 109.8% | 49.6% | 60.2% | Denmark |
| 2000s | 106.9% | 64.5% | 42.3% | Denmark |
| 2010s | 106.1% | 78.9% | 27.2% | Denmark |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female, Denmark or Low income?
- Denmark, at 106.2% against 80.2% in Low income as of 2018.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female between Denmark and Low income?
- 26.0%, with Denmark ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Low income?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2018.
- How do Denmark and Low income rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female?
- Denmark ranks 43rd and Low income ranks 42nd of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total female enrollment in primary and lower secondary education, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the female population of official primary and lower secondary education age. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.