Aruba vs Middle income: Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female
Aruba
109.2%
in 2012
Middle income
96.5%
in 2019
Aruba rank
26th
Middle income rank
24th
Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female over time
- Aruba
- Middle income
How they compare
Aruba currently reports 109.2% against 96.5% in Middle income, a difference of 12.7%.
That makes Aruba's figure about 1.1 times Middle income's.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Aruba has been ahead every year.
Aruba ranks 26th and Middle income ranks 24th of 188 countries.
Aruba has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Middle income | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 112.3% | 86.1% | 26.2% | Aruba |
| 2000s | 109.3% | 91.9% | 17.5% | Aruba |
| 2010s | 108.9% | 96.8% | 12.1% | Aruba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female, Aruba or Middle income?
- Aruba, at 109.2% against 96.5% in Middle income as of 2012.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female between Aruba and Middle income?
- 12.7%, with Aruba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Middle income?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2012.
- How do Aruba and Middle income rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female?
- Aruba ranks 26th and Middle income ranks 24th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total female enrollment in primary and lower secondary education, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the female population of official primary and lower secondary education age. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.