Low income vs Luxembourg: Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, both sexes
Low income
84.4%
in 2018
Luxembourg
107.9%
in 2018
Low income rank
40th
Luxembourg rank
35th
Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, both sexes over time
- Low income
- Luxembourg
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports 107.9% against 84.4% in Low income, a difference of 23.5%.
That makes Luxembourg's figure about 1.3 times Low income's.
Across all 21 years both countries report, Luxembourg has been ahead every year.
Low income ranks 40th and Luxembourg ranks 35th of 45 groups.
Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Low income | Luxembourg | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 57.9% | 99.4% | 41.5% | Luxembourg |
| 2000s | 70.3% | 102.5% | 32.2% | Luxembourg |
| 2010s | 83.5% | 104.3% | 20.8% | Luxembourg |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, both sexes, Low income or Luxembourg?
- Luxembourg, at 107.9% against 84.4% in Low income as of 2018.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, both sexes between Low income and Luxembourg?
- 23.5%, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Low income and Luxembourg?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2018.
- How do Low income and Luxembourg rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, both sexes?
- Low income ranks 40th and Luxembourg ranks 35th of 45 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, both sexes (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total enrollment in primary and lower secondary education, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the population of official primary and lower secondary education age. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.